Poker is gambling and
gambling less than lottery and other betting games,
where only involves chance and not a hint of skill.
Using game addiction argument as an argument against
obliging of poker gets me completely behind.
As those who are addicted to it often regardless of what
they are addicted. People are as addicted to smoking and
alcohol as well, which admittedly is a problem, but we
do not prohibit smoking and alcohol for most people
because of that.
It must be that way, so the basic principle of the
Liberal " ideology " is that it must be up to each
individual how to spend their money and time. Gambling ,
in whatever form , is generally not harmful to anyone,
and when there are underlying causes that underlie . It
damages howsoever not others than the self getting into
trouble , unlike the aforementioned alcohol and tobacco.
Opponents of liberalizing the sort is probably Christian
moralists , and people have misconceptions about what
poker is (due to previous misconceptions about poker as
gambling and games with criminal elements ) . Poker is
now something for most people. Thus, it is meaningless
that it is illegal.
Why can not the Left who will emerge as the Liberal
party take an official stance to legalize poker and
similar games . It's talking about a huge user base
should look like from online gaming figures , and to be
a front runner in such a debate will clearly capture the
voters .In these days of newspaper addressees (
addressing ) , it has been focused on the so-called
secret poker clubs , creating debate among newspaper
readers. After you select the version of the game, check
in at the casino (opening balance).